I’m an atheist (yes you can be an atheist Fridgidarian!) and for the last couple of years, I’m often accused of lacking faith. Having been once fully vested in the idea of it I can understand where this accusation comes from. My studies of epistemology have since taught me how unreliable faith is as a reason to believe something. Something I often bring up here on the Fridge. Of course, to a devout believer faith is everything. The very foundation of their belief. So the idea that I don’t see it as a reliable tool to build said foundation with I’m sure is very disconcerting.
Here’s the rub though. I don’t see faith as a useless tool either. Let me explain. First, why is it a poor reason to believe? For the simple fact people can have faith in completely false things. Just having faith in something isn’t a very good foundation for belief. It’s too easily fooled. That’s not all though. The other place this becomes problematic is when you blame the person that doesn’t get the same results as you on their lack of faith.
Watch out for the loop!
It’s the leap of faith that leads to the loop of faith that creates a situation where a person can be forever convinced a falsehood is absolutely true. In case you didn’t pick up on the wordplay, a loop of faith is more commonly referred to as circular logic or circular reasoning.
Here is an example of faulty faith-based reasoning:
Say someone told you that the book Harry Potter is a true history and if you would read it and have enough faith you too would receive a spiritual witness that Harry Potter is true. If you take them to heart, read the book you will either have a spiritual impression or not. And that’s were religion takes advantage of you. If you get the specified result that of course proves Harry Potter is, in fact, a true book. If you don’t get the result, it’s not the book’s fault…you just didn’t have enough faith.
This is an unfalsifiable claim. It can’t be proven wrong, and if you are interested in believing as few wrong things as possible it’s worth recognizing. The way out of this mess is pretty simple too. Just come up with a reasonable way to falsify the claim. If you can’t do so, might I suggest just believing it isn’t a particularly fruitful way to avoid mistakes either? After all, I can claim there are purple space unicorns controlling your mind with invisible marshmallow lasers and you’d have a pretty hard time proving there isn’t. Now is the light dawning on why Hitchens shaves with a particular razor?
I hope you now see that buying into a proposition ‘just because’ is not particularly useful either. That is if seeking the truth is your goal. That pretty much eliminates what we might call blind faith. I’ve noticed that most people can see that problem so I feel no need to delve any further in that direction.
Making faith a virtue again
So where does that leave us? I think that rather depends on the definition of the word. I see it as basically, hope in action. Case in point, right now in my lab I am conducting an experiment. I don’t know if it will work or not. But I hope it does and I have enough faith in my particular insight to put it all together and give it a shot.
Will my efforts be rewarded? I have no idea. If it is, will it lead to products that will allow me to retire and write blog posts all day? Fridge only knows. But I will say this. If the experiment doesn’t work, I’m not gonna blame my lack of faith. The only thing that can do is stop you from even trying. You might even say without it we wouldn’t take any risks.
I’m not a huge fan of religion, particularly the organized kind that generates wealth for a few by entrapping their members in circular reasoning. But I can’t say every concept religions have come up with are all bad. In fact, modern reasoning and scientific inquiry evolved from priests that really were looking for truth rather than pretending they already found it. So when in doubt? Go ahead and take that leap of faith… Just don’t let it run you in circles!